Tantanea Update
Oct. 24th, 2005 11:01 amSpending some time cleaning up the wiki, making sure stuff is better cross-linked and filling in some of the gaps.
I think I handled
jeffwik's wanting to gain information wrong. Given what Wheel of Fortune do I think it may be more appropriate to handle this as an extended contest based on Calix Occultus augmented by Divination. What do you think Jeff?
This brings me to a wider issue of how to handle some of Jeff's ability as a Wheel of Fortune. The standard method (for good reason) for handling special information gathering abilities in games is a pull model – the player has to ask for information. This makes sense as its easier on the gm ad prevents needless red-herrings or too many red flags that might derail plots. But in a game structured like tantanea it actually makes more sense to have a push method. Keshditenku has a very “always seeking pattern” approach which makes sense, it is what his Arcanum does. And given the nature of the game where all these patterns have potential meaning it does make sense for it all to be out there. Of course it still means more work for me so I’m not sure how I want to handle the matter yet.
Still working on straightening out the new player situation. Hope this gets resolved soon.
And I really owe a post-mortem on Revisionist History and why I think it didn’t work.
I think I handled
This brings me to a wider issue of how to handle some of Jeff's ability as a Wheel of Fortune. The standard method (for good reason) for handling special information gathering abilities in games is a pull model – the player has to ask for information. This makes sense as its easier on the gm ad prevents needless red-herrings or too many red flags that might derail plots. But in a game structured like tantanea it actually makes more sense to have a push method. Keshditenku has a very “always seeking pattern” approach which makes sense, it is what his Arcanum does. And given the nature of the game where all these patterns have potential meaning it does make sense for it all to be out there. Of course it still means more work for me so I’m not sure how I want to handle the matter yet.
Still working on straightening out the new player situation. Hope this gets resolved soon.
And I really owe a post-mortem on Revisionist History and why I think it didn’t work.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-24 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-24 03:45 pm (UTC)Want to do this online to save time?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-24 03:51 pm (UTC)Sure, but later.
Whats happening in Russia
Date: 2005-10-24 03:54 pm (UTC)Smoking Mirror
Date: 2005-10-24 03:54 pm (UTC)Re: Smoking Mirror
Date: 2005-10-24 04:03 pm (UTC)Re: Smoking Mirror
Date: 2005-10-24 04:11 pm (UTC)I was confused thinking you might want to do something as a follow-up as a result of your post here.
Round 1
Date: 2005-10-24 07:28 pm (UTC)Re: Round 1
Date: 2005-10-24 07:28 pm (UTC)Revisionist History
Date: 2005-10-25 07:03 am (UTC)Thanks to you guys for playing it though. That was really gratifying to find that it interested some people.